Due to the fact there would not seem like any "official" Load Data on the market for this Load, can several of you deliver a starting point with this mix and items to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
With regards to bench rest matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted far more wins than all other propellants blended. A wonderful extruded powder, it flows precisely and without difficulty by means of measures and provides match-quality accuracy when set to employ.
The point that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you're seeing greater velocities acquired with that powder, as opposed to Everything you've observed Together with the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but considerably greater suited to somewhat smaller sized instances having a little bit fewer potential.
I've experienced a handful of rifles that fouled truly terrible. Having many of the copper out was a real PIA right up until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
In any case, I understood The 2 lbs of H4831SC employed precisely the same data, but I didn't know regardless of whether there was just about anything different concerning a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and one particular not so labeled. A phone to Hodgdon verified that they were in actual fact equivalent and the only variance was the logo to the label.
Did you at any time try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with common chamber. Thinking What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
If there isn't any load data it truly is mainly because this powder will not be well suited for this cartridge. Commonly one particular will not likely uncover a single powder to fit all cartridges, as well as spouse and children of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about would not function.
In reality, It is even a good idea to back down and do the job h4831 vs h4831sc up safely whenever you go from just one good deal to a different wide range of the exact same powder.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make use of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Excessive powder.
locutus claimed: I however have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows via my powder measures smoothly.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are entirely various powders, with IMR 4831 staying substantially a lot quicker when compared h4831sc load data to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't handle them as the exact same powder, because they most definitely are certainly not.
The "SC" stands for Brief Cut. I have not seen a difference between both powder dut I don't Imagine I might mix h4831sc load data them.
I usually normally obtain the sc Variation. Utilizing a powder evaluate it hangs up much less as a consequence of shorter kernels and I feel will allow a lot more dependable metering so considerably less time you are taking trickling in the last little bit of demand to create body weight. So essentially the SC will save you situations
The reality that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be looking at bigger velocities obtained with that powder, instead of Everything you've witnessed Along with the IMR things.